The ‘Penalty Kick?’ Betting System

Penalty Kick System
In today’s guest post, Dave Renham of punterprofits.com looks at the effect on performance of horses saddled with a penalty. In it, he looks at various angles before offering a couple of mini-systems which exemplify how to optimally play horses carrying a penalty.
Here’s Dave:
Penalty Carriers
This week I am going to look at penalty carriers on the flat racing in the UK. The data has been taken from 2009 to June 17th 2012. All profits and losses quoted in the article are to SP. Backing profits can therefore be improved in real life through use of best odds price taking or using betting exchanges such as Betfair.
So why look at penalty carriers? Well, although they are forced to the carry extra weight of the penalty, trainers often try to take advantage of the horse being in form before being reassessed by the handicapper. Let us see therefore the performance of all penalty carriers over the period of study:
Runners |
Wins |
SR% |
Profit/loss |
ROI % |
2570 |
588 |
22.9 |
-£112.09 |
-4.4 |
This is a fairly solid set of figures with losses equating to only 4.4 pence in the £, and a good number of selections to boot. Let us breakdown this data starting by looking at the position in the market:
Market position |
Runners |
Wins |
SR% |
Profit/loss |
ROI % |
Favourite |
1072 |
376 |
35.1 |
-£42.68 |
-4.0 |
2nd Favourite |
503 |
104 |
20.7 |
-£19.90 |
-4.0 |
3rd Favourite |
303 |
51 |
16.8 |
+£17.49 |
+5.8 |
4th Favourite |
221 |
24 |
10.9 |
-£21.50 |
-9.7 |
5+ in betting |
471 |
33 |
7.0 |
-£45.50 |
-9.7 |
A position in the top three in the betting has been preferable both in terms of strike rate and in terms of returns. Although third favourites have made a small profit I would not advocate backing them blind as I would not expect that profit to be replicated over a similar future time frame.
I looked at the age of runners next:
Age |
Runners |
Wins |
SR% |
Profit/loss |
ROI % |
2 |
133 |
31 |
23.3 |
-£16.38 |
-12.3 |
3 |
743 |
223 |
30.0 |
+£53.70 |
+7.2 |
4 |
603 |
127 |
21.1 |
-£28.26 |
-4.7 |
5 |
436 |
88 |
20.2 |
-£39.92 |
-9.2 |
6 |
285 |
59 |
20.7 |
-£13.07 |
-4.6 |
7 |
199 |
34 |
17.1 |
-£16.41 |
-8.3 |
8 |
96 |
16 |
16.7 |
-£14.63 |
-15.2 |
9+ |
75 |
10 |
13.3 |
-£37.13 |
-49.5 |
The record of 3yos looks impressive on the surface. Conversely, results for horses aged 9 and older are poor and they look worth avoiding. The 3yo performance I felt merited further investigation and a pleasing stat to note is that they have made a profit in every year – 2009, 2010, 2011 and the first half of 2012.
That suggests consistency which is a plus when looking at potential punting angles. Another positive angle worth noting is the performance of 3yo penalty carriers in open handicaps (3yo+ races). They have produced 80 winners from 276 runners (SR 29%) for a profit of £64.88 (ROI +23.5%). The reason why the returns in these contests have been far better than the overall figure is probably down to punter prejudice.
Most punters would expect a 3yo penalty carrier to be less successful when racing older horses as compared to when racing against his/her own age group. Hence in open (3yo+) I suspect these penalty carriers tend to start at slightly bigger prices than they should due to this pre-conception.
Onto class of race next:
Class |
Runners |
Wins |
SR% |
Profit/loss |
ROI % |
1 |
5 |
0 |
0.0 |
-£5.00 |
-100.0 |
2 |
231 |
20 |
8.7 |
-£49.75 |
-21.5 |
3 |
113 |
25 |
22.1 |
+£40.57 |
+35.9 |
4 |
509 |
116 |
22.8 |
+£7.09 |
+1.4 |
5 |
838 |
202 |
24.1 |
-£109.19 |
-13.0 |
6 |
825 |
208 |
25.2 |
-£4.34 |
-0.5 |
7 |
49 |
17 |
34.7 |
+£8.53 |
+17.4 |
There does seem to be a pattern here with the higher class races (2 and above) performing below expectations, while the lowest class races (6 and 7) performing over expectations and actually making a nominal profit.
Next I wanted to look at claiming jockeys. Trainers sometimes try and ‘offset’ the penalty by putting a claiming jockey on board. Is this a good ploy? Well let’s look at the stats:
Jockey claim |
Runners |
Wins |
SR% |
Profit/loss |
ROI % |
No claim |
1722 |
416 |
24.2 |
-£36.48 |
-2.1 |
Claim 3lb+ |
848 |
172 |
20.3 |
-£75.60 |
-8.9 |
The figures suggest there is no advantage to be had by placing a claiming jockey on board. In fact, they have performed worse in terms of both strike rate and returns. Indeed, it is worth noting that 7lb claimers have managed a strike rate of only 17% with losses of 27% (27 pence in the £).
Finally let me look at trainers to see whether there are any trainers who are adept at placing horses carrying penalties. Here is a list of those trainers that have secured 7 or more winners.
Trainers |
Runners |
Wins |
SR% |
Profit/loss |
ROI % |
Roger Charlton |
13 |
7 |
53.9 |
+£0.91 |
+7.0 |
Sir Mark Prescott |
58 |
31 |
53.5 |
+£4.10 |
+7.1 |
Kevin Ryan |
38 |
19 |
50.0 |
+£24.51 |
+64.5 |
Ian Williams |
17 |
8 |
47.1 |
+£9.56 |
+56.3 |
Alan Swinbank |
16 |
7 |
43.8 |
+£4.07 |
+25.4 |
Michael Wigham |
16 |
7 |
43.8 |
+£11.67 |
+73.0 |
George Baker |
21 |
9 |
42.9 |
+£3.24 |
+15.4 |
Stuart Williams |
24 |
10 |
41.7 |
+£11.90 |
+49.6 |
Richard Hannon |
24 |
8 |
33.3 |
+£17.00 |
+70.8 |
Tim Easterby |
24 |
8 |
33.3 |
+£4.21 |
+17.5 |
Bryan Smart |
29 |
9 |
31.0 |
-£3.35 |
-11.6 |
Michael Easterby |
23 |
7 |
30.4 |
-£1.38 |
-6.0 |
Paul Midgley |
31 |
9 |
29.0 |
+£8.97 |
+29.0 |
Milton Bradley |
29 |
7 |
24.1 |
+£12.88 |
+44.4 |
Mark Johnston |
114 |
25 |
21.9 |
+£4.25 |
+3.7 |
Richard Fahey |
42 |
8 |
19.1 |
-£11.68 |
-27.8 |
Ruth Carr |
43 |
8 |
18.6 |
-£3.00 |
-7.0 |
David Evans |
61 |
7 |
11.5 |
-£24.25 |
-39.8 |
Sir Mark Prescott is renowned for running horses quickly after a win, but despite an excellent strike rate, profits are small. Perhaps the trainer to take out of this is Kevin Ryan – a 50% strike rate is excellent as are returns of 64p in the £.
To conclude you could do a lot worse than backing a good proportion of penalty carriers. I would pay most attention to 3yos (especially in 3yo+ handicaps), and also I would look closely at class 6-7 handicaps. Any penalty carrier trained by one of the trainers with a positive return, most notably Kevin Ryan, are also worth close scrutiny. In terms of negatives, I would avoid horses aged 9 and older, class 2 or higher handicaps and any horse ridden by a 7lb claimer.
Dave Renham
Dave Renham is a research writer for the Racing & Football Outlook newspaper.
Register for free at his www.PunterProfits.com website to access additional horse racing research articles from Dave. There is also a premium area where users can get hold of Dave’s National Hunt portfolio, and plenty more besides.
Full details on Punter Profits are here.
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!